Brooklyn Bar Association holds training program on Article 81 Adult Guardianship

Brooklyn Bar Association holds training program on Article 81 Adult Guardianship

By Rob Abruzzese, Legal Editor Brooklyn Daily Eagle

Article 81 Guardianship cases can be complex and very unique which is why the Brooklyn Bar Association hosts day-long training sessions every couple of years to educate attorneys. From left: Helen Galette, Anthony Lamberti, Daniel R. Miller and Hon. Ellen M. Spodek. Eagle photos by Rob Abruzzese
Article 81 Guardianship cases can be complex and very unique which is why the Brooklyn Bar Association hosts day-long training sessions every couple of years to educate attorneys. From left: Helen Galette, Anthony Lamberti, Daniel R. Miller and Hon. Ellen M. Spodek. Eagle photos by Rob Abruzzese

The Brooklyn Bar Association hosted a Mental Hygiene Law Article 81 Training session in Brooklyn Heights on Thursday, Nov. 8. The program is a day-long Continuing Legal Education seminar that featured a judge and seven attorneys who each taught an aspect of handling such complex cases.

The training session, titled, “2018 Office of Court Administration Approved Mental Hygiene Law Article 81 Guardianship Training Program,” was organized by Brooklyn Bar Association, Elder Law Committee co-chairs Anthony Lamberti, Fern Finkel and Daniel R. Miller.

“They’re pretty complex proceedings as you are handling people’s affairs when they are incapacitated and unable to handle those affairs,” Lamberti said. “We have a pretty wide array of speakers, many of whom are BBA members who practice in the area and are highly qualified. There aren’t a lot of resources better to help you with this information so that you can get qualified to handle these cases in the future.”

Fern J. Finkel Brooklyn Bar Association holds training program on Article 81 Adult Guardianship

The other speakers included Julie Stoil-Fernandez, who discussed the role of a court evaluator, Michele Lippa Gartner, who covered Part 36 Rules of the Chief Judge, James Cahill instructed on commencement of proceedings, Helen Galette compared Article 17A and Article 81 guardianships, and Justice Ellen Spodek lectured on the hearing itself.

Julie Stoil Fernandez Brooklyn Bar Association holds training program on Article 81 Adult Guardianship

Attorneys who handle Article 81 cases must take this court, or one similar to it offered by other bar associations. The Brooklyn Bar Association typically hosts this training every two to three years and makes the session available online as well for attorneys who cannot make it in person.

Established as law in New York State in 1992, Article 81 of the Mental Hygiene Law allows the court to appoint a guardian for personal needs or property management for incapacitated adults. The idea is that a guardian is given the least amount of authority to satisfy the needs of an incapacitated person and helps a person only in the areas for which a person requires assistance.

“It’s a very sensitive set of circumstances when you are taking away a person’s rights in essence,” Lamberti said. “They can’t handle their affairs, can’t handle money, make decisions about their own health care. These are complex proceedings, with evidentiary standards and burdens of proof.

“There are also different roles within a case,” he continued. “Everybody has a role and the thought was to enhance attorney’s abilities to perform these roles with programs like this.”

Lamberti chuckled to himself as he thought back to early training programs that he attended out of law school. He explained that because every case is unique it can be hard for attorneys to take on cases by simply reading the law and suggested that attorney’s personal experiences can go a long way to teaching someone how to handle these cases.

“This is just the tip of the iceberg, really,” Lamberti said. “We’re exposing people who don’t practice in this area to these hearings and some of the things that go on. You really don’t get the feeling and learn about how it goes on into these cases until you take a few and get involved. It’s a certain amount of substantive law and a lot of anecdotal application based on what we’ve encountered over the years.”

Rated By Super Lawyers

Attorney Name, ESQ.

Title

Tagline/Motto

Elder Law aetsent pellentesque odio sit amet iaculis consequat. Duis auctor vulputate ultrices. Pellentesque tincidunt erat leo, a pulvinar est dapibus sit amet. Aenean placerat efficitur ante, a ultrices est ultrices eget. Ut aliquam euismod enim, ac imperdiet odio molestie sit amet. Integer et sapien a mauris posuere fringilla nec vel dolor. Integer volutpat ex at lobortis malesuada. In sed maximus felis, pulvinar sollicitudin sem. Donec at ornare diam. Sed pretium nulla non ligula placerat, sit amet dignissim nunc sollicitudin. Curabitur nec est condimentum, vulputate urna sed, congue felis. Donec sed mauris vitae ex ullamcorper molestie. Praesent vel velit ac neque dapibus imperdiet non vel orci. Praesent sodales egestas posuere. Suspendisse in sapien vel enim tincidunt molestie et quis arcu. Sed tincidunt nulla nec urna mattis bibendum.

Ut sem ipsum, imperdiet in imperdiet et, ultricies ac velit. In vitae porttitor neque. Morbi egestas porttitor pharetra. Orci varius natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Nam ut justo ut ante porttitor placerat. Nunc nec rutrum lacus. Phasellus vitae sapien eu quam facilisis accumsan. Maecenas consectetur vitae est suscipit dictum. Nulla sollicitudin libero volutpat, dictum libero a, auctor purus.

Maecenas suscipit leo efficitur libero scelerisque, et consequat libero scelerisque. Ut ultrices commodo ligula vitae iaculis. Proin sollicitudin bibendum nisl vel accumsan. Morbi interdum risus at eros euismod pulvinar. Donec ut nibh at enim dignissim finibus tristique a justo. Mauris convallis, urna nec fermentum interdum, est risus sodales urna, vel blandit mauris libero eu erat. Phasellus sollicitudin, orci in ornare vehicula, est sem gravida turpis, quis porttitor metus tortor id lorem. Maecenas vitae massa nec ipsum tincidunt venenatis eget ac urna. Proin euismod purus euismod mi mollis posuere. Pellentesque habitant morbi tristique senectus et netus et malesuada fames ac turpis egestas. Curabitur auctor posuere nunc, quis tincidunt arcu.

Maecenas consectetur vel augue vitae consectetur. Suspendisse vitae vehicula dolor, quis suscipit leo. Etiam risus felis, consequat et consequat rhoncus, volutpat in metus. Praesent vel ornare orci, et sagittis mauris. Sed ut porta tellus, nec tempor nibh. Vestibulum tristique nunc at arcu iaculis, sed pellentesque urna lacinia. Maecenas suscipit diam eu tincidunt accumsan. Maecenas eget ullamcorper est, vitae tristique est. Donec sed aliquam nunc, a ornare felis. Nullam semper, velit semper iaculis scelerisque, risus dui mollis nulla, vitae auctor velit orci a elit. Etiam eleifend diam et tempor congue. Integer efficitur tellus a dolor sagittis rutrum.

Testimonials

Here is what our clients are saying

“She had full knowledge of my selected legal case and completed the work and case to my satisfaction. Highly Recommend!”
Jane Smith
New York, NY
“She had full knowledge of my selected legal case and completed the work and case to my satisfaction. Highly Recommend!”
John Doe
John Doe, Westchester NY
“She had full knowledge of my selected legal case and completed the work and case to my satisfaction. Highly Recommend!”
Maria Feliby,
Merrick, NY